Out
Kathy Y. Wilson, also known as Your Negro Tour Guide, wrote last week:
My sexuality has long been among a grocery list of judgment-heavy words like speculation, discussion, debate, horror, fear, damnation and prayer. Perhaps yours as much as mine.
As such there are people who even think my sexuality invalidates my intellect; that it backspaces me to the child's table. Some people say I don't speak for Negroes or anyone else.
Why, they're absolutely right. I didn't sign up to be spokeswoman for anyone but myself. Nothing about me gets co-opted. Still, it's fodder.
"Eck! She's a dyke," they whisper. "Nobody's listening to her."
Most of these homophobic naysayers connecting the incorrect dots are Negroes. Many in that number are Christians. They've forgotten that we collectively and individually have so much work to do that fretting over who's in my bed is not only counterproductive but silly and dangerous. It shows a real lack of focus.
So. Homophobia (or whatever we're meant to be calling it, since it's not a real phobia) in the black community.
You expect it from the ignorant, the backwards, reactionary, the Republicans and Libertarians, but it's more that a little disturbing to see among progressives:
Black civil rights leaders in the 1950s and 1960s stiff-armed James Baldwin back in the day. Forget that Baldwin was a pied piper for racial and social equality whose pen wielded significant influence. He was an ugly black faggot.
That's Kathy again. Moving beyond progressive and looping back towards reactionary, Clara B. Jones and Robert A. Dickerson write in Are Black Males Homophobic?---A Note:
In 1968, Eldridge Cleaver stated, Homosexuality is a sickness, just as are baby-rape or wanting to become head of General Motors. To be a healthy male, then, is to be homophobic, afraid of and opposed to homosexuality. It may be no accident that Cleaver was a Black male, spokesman for a generation asserting their rights to power and authority in a hostile environment. Power and authority were not only political and economic, but also sexual. The Black male, according to Cleaver, should reject social pathologies in the forms of capitalism and homosexuality. More recently, homophobia by Black males was also reinforced by Louis Farrakhan who equated homosexuality with prostitution and drug addiction in his 1995 State of America address.
(I've long since given up trying to figure out how Farrakhan or the Nation feel about a particular issue. Between their own inflammatory rhetoric, and the just-as-bad counterattacks from the mainstream, there's no point. But I digress.)
[. . .] In a 1989 essay, the Black feminist bell hooks addressed Homophobia in Black Communities. She argued that homophobia is less likely where poverty enforces a context in which structures of dependence were important for everyday survival. Hooks views are similar to those of the social scientists Charles Zastrow and Karen Kirst-Ashman who state that, nonwhite gay men may see their racial and ethnic communities as safe havens from the oppressive white majority culture. Hooks also suggested that homophobia may be less common among southern Blacks who may be more openly expressive of their sexual preference and whose communities may be more tolerant of diversity. Hooks raises the interesting possibility that Blacks may be perceived as homophobic because they are more likely to express anti-gay opinions. Cleaver and Farrakhan may not be more homophobic than their white counterparts, then, they may simply be more predisposed to express their homophobic beliefs and attitudes.
Wondered where I'd ripped that last idea off from.
Then again, Marlon Riggs covered all this a long time ago, and no one cared then, either.
Comments
Dude,
Libertarians aren't usually homophobic. They simply don't give a shit what anyone else does as long as it doesn't affect their rights.
Phil
Posted by: Phil | August 21, 2002 10:58 AM
Hey, Phil, how about I send you a link to my friend's dissertation [once it's finished & available online] about the rhetoric of public policy, so that you can get some context on how cultural ideas about race, class, and gender [and sexual orientation] might, just MIGHT be influencing, or Even Constructing their [your?] definitions of "rights"?
Posted by: Neogrammarian | August 21, 2002 11:44 AM
See, you're so much nicer than I am.
Phil, in practical terms the Libertarians usually end up supporting the status quo. The theory is all well and good, but irrelevant.
That, and they make the Republicans seem diverse in comparison.
Posted by: Aaron | August 21, 2002 12:53 PM
Shouldn't he have called it "Are Straight Black Males Homophobic---A Note"?
Or, to be more accurate, "Are Certain (Ostensibly) Straight Black Males Homophobic---A Note"?
??
Posted by: Laura | August 21, 2002 10:32 PM
Wait, Laura, are you suggesting that he has to clarify more than color there?
Oh my god...so if someone writes 'man' I shouldn't assume it means 'white, straight, american male aged 25-44'?
Damnit...now you're just being difficult.
Posted by: Jason | August 22, 2002 2:51 AM
Jason, it's what she doe-- oh, hi Laura, didn't realize you were still here.
Eheh.
Didn't notice that until you pointed it out. Thanks.
Posted by: Aaron | August 22, 2002 8:10 AM
"Robert A. Dickerson is a 1999 graduate of Livingstone College where he was a Psychology major. He is currently teaching English in China."
All you old-timer Humanities majors out there: remember when that was a viable career choice? Am I hallucinating or is it really 1992?
Posted by: Laura | August 23, 2002 12:26 AM
Woo hoo! My fashion tastes are back in style!
Now I just have to wait for that gum that I like.
So is teaching English in Korea really as fulfilling as the brochure makes it sound? And I don't have to know any Korean at all? And the pay will allow me to live on Phat Beach?
Posted by: Aaron | August 23, 2002 7:24 AM