All Over the World

| 6 Comments | No TrackBacks

Ok. Valuable lesson yesterday. When I'm tired and grumpy, I get all intellectual. Or what passes for intellectual with me, anyway.

Don't worry, skimming it I'm not sure what the hell I was talking about either.

Over at Bellona Times, Ray Davis writes an insightful but less academia-flavored take on the previous season of Buffy:

In a television series, we can be sure that the regulars will return, no matter how much crap they're dragged through, and we can be sure that they'll stay together, no matter how dreadfully they may have behaved towards each other.

Which quote isn't particularly representative, or much of an indication of what the entry is about. But I didn't want to just say, "This is cool, click the link and read it."

Wait, can I do that?

Jim Romenesko's Media News links to an article in USA Today, of all places, on how 'Boondocks' comic echoes African-American thoughts:

As much as it might pain some to hear this, the barbs offered up by Freeman -- McGruder's black everyman -- closely track the thinking of a broad cross section of African-Americans. That's a truth many of the strip's critics avoid as assiduously as a stroll through an inner-city neighborhood.

McGruder's comic strip is an unwavering voice of black consciousness. He is as much the nemesis of the black leaders he believes have gone astray as he is of whites he thinks have undermined the interests of African-Americans.

That makes him a very dangerous black man.

There was also a piece in the Chicago Tribune a few days back.

And to a certain category of readers, [McGruder] has become like a torturer's needles shoved under their fingernails--a persistent source of pain and anger and outrage. In the just-over two years that I have been the Tribune's public editor, rarely has a week gone by without at least one complaint about "The Boondocks." Invariably the complaints are from white readers; I can't recall a single one from someone who said he was black.

Ok, guess they just stopped complaining before he took over. Or stopped reading the strip. Or something, because I'm not buying that clear a racial breakdown on complaints.

Found another mention doing a Google search for that Trib column (which I'd originally seen linked yesterday at, um, Anil Dash's maybe?), from the Atlanta Journal Constitution:

I'm not a "Boondocks" fan. But I am a fan of the First Amendment, which means McGruder has the right to make fun of the president of the United States and to make my life complicated by doing so, which he does -- often.

The controversy over this particular strip was compounded by its running in the Sunday comics pages, which are printed in advance and often are not read by news editors before being distributed. (During the week, "The Boondocks" runs inside the Living section, and editors have, in the past, tweaked its language before publication.)

Which is. . . interesting. I didn't know they could do that, and would like to see some examples.

On second thought, I probably wouldn't.

Right, checked, the Trib column was linked where I thought it was. Also followed a link to Identity Theory because I am Sarah Vowell's bitch.

That last link is to an interview with her. It's cool. Click the link and read it.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.uppity-negro.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/384

6 Comments

Just for the record: Aaron McGruder is the bomb. Kinda cute, too, judging from the one time I laid eyes on him in the flesh. Mmm, smart cute talented men.

I can't recall a single one from someone who said he was black.

I think that phrasing's probably pretty telling, Aaron. Unless they make it a policy to ask, "Are you black?" when people complain about Boondocks, of course, which they might, who knows?

Or I could be wrong. Who knows?

Based on the whole j*e b*xer thing, my guess is that when white people are complaining about something that colored folks done did they like to start off said complaints with the following:

"I'm a white [insert your age/gender modifier here]"

By the by, Today's strip is all kinds of smirky fun.

Do newspapers have the right to edit someone's strip? That's scary. Do you think they do that to Doonesbury or Mallard Fillmore (is that the conservative strip?) or any of the Wiley strips?

I'm curious about the trib article...in the past year, Boondocks has talked so little about Black/White Issues that I wouldn't imagine any white folks even take notice of the content.

Is President Bashing a "black/white" thing?

i think PE could have written a really good rap entitled "sunday comics are a joke". given the choice between the flat-out religious fanatic/ reactionary political bent of crap like b.c., the self-hating misogynist stereotyping of cathy, the scary assed white people with kiddie porn subtexts of family circus, and the biogoted ethnocentric stereotyping of viking people in hagar the horrible, i'll take boondocks any day, because goddamn it, it just fuckin' makes me laugh. all that other stuff is bullshit. particularly since dan piraro's "bizarro" all but disappeared due to his dangerous anti-establishment leanings, and zippy done sold out. hell, my damn newspaper doesn't even carry doonesbury any more. where's my "liberal-controlled media" they promised me??

LA Times still carries Bizarro.

After Boondocks though, I might enjoy Ballard Street the most. I'm pretty fond of "one big happy" too but I like word play.

I coulda sworn there was an incident where black people were picketing against the Boondocks strip at the Chicago Tribune, when it first appeared. But I can't find any such notion. I guess I dreamed da whole thing...

FYI: Just to remind everyone that none of this is new...

The Banned Boondocks Strips (2000)
http://www.boondocks.net/banned.html

'Boondocks' strikes a nerve -- again (2000)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/lifestyle/boon31.shtml

Leave a comment