Exhibit A: Chicago Bears - Superbowl Shuffle mp3 (no longer available for reasons of space, bandwidth and good taste. . . crazy ain't gotta mean ugly. Which don't explain --)
Exhibit B: Reading Mister Charlie:
White House: assassination of Saddam would be cheaper than warHmm, lessee. Nine billion bucks for a month's worth of battle, or less than a buck for a single bullet in the skull.
By George, I think Ari's right. Now watch the lefty loons start to screech about how horrible is the very notion of blowing Saddam away.
And the creatures he chooses not to ban:
They're aiming for the wrong guy: from lucianne:
Following the stolen election of 2000, the United States economy was healthy and experiencing the greatest period of economic prosperity it has ever enjoyed. From 1992-2000, the federal government had a $1.5 trillion surplus. It only took nine months for the surplus to be given to the rich (corporations that profit from war) at the expense of the poor.-snip-The Center also notes that “last year’s tax cut is the largest single reason the ten-year surplus has shrunk since January 2001.”
An article from everyone's fav adulterous reverend.
And here I thought you lot had already killed "everyone's fav adulterous reverend," in Memphis, back in '68.
My bad.
Ophelia: ~ Sings ~
They bore him barefaced on the bier;
Hey non nonny, nonny, hey nonny;
And in his grave rain'd many a tear:--
Fare you well, my dove!
. . . they're not going to fall for this, are they?
Ended up at Daily Pundit by way of In Arguendo, by way of Pen-Elayne on the Web, by way of a comment at Comicon.com PULSE's coverage of the Gaiman-McFarlane trial.
Ok, that ought to help. . .
You make me dizzy. In a good way.
Quiet, you. I'm still bitter about the Miyazaki film thing.
Which I saw, and loved, and should probably write about at some point. . .
that "one bullet" thing really made my blood run cold. the thing is, if taking out saddam hussein was REALLY all those people wanted, it would have been done back when he still worked for us. they don't have 401k plans in that line of work. anybody remember panama?
It was perfectly legal for us to blare shitty music at the Vatican embassy to get Noriega to leave it. And for us to then take him out of the country.
Why?
Because.
We ever re-try him, or did that in absentia conviction do it?
He was convicted of something before we locked him up, right? Rather than sending him to Saudi Arabia, like we did Idi Amin? And it's such a joy to read the warbloggers condemn the Saudis for this, like it was their fucking idea. . .
Time for more coffee, I think.