Hey poor, you don't have to be. . .

I would ignore the context, in this case Kathryn Jean Lopez on David Hager & FDA on National Review Online, and just look for other articles by conservatives which use the phrase, "But here's the kicker." They seem to like that one. Me, I like saying "cuntabulous." Different strokes and shit.

Ignoring the context might be a good plan.

Dr. W. David Hager, a doctor and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Kentucky, was the subject of a piece in Time magazine by Karen Tumulty titled "Jesus and the FDA." Dr. Hager, it would seem, is a "Jesus freak" (my words, not Tumulty's) who wants to reverse Roe v. Wade by questioning a drug treatment that appears to be dangerous, refuses to prescribe birth control to unmarried women, and, actually, would rather have his patients pray and wait for Divine intervention than medically act to treat disease.

Sounds kinda silly, doesn't it? Well, it is.

Um, she goes on to illustrate the Deeply Flawed Liberal Bias of the Time piece, which NRO couldn't be arsed to link to, but Jessica did, and Laura linked to her. . .

Oh. It's all women talking about this. Guess it doesn't concern or interest me.

Right. Back to packing.

There's an Action Alert at Population Connection, if, y'know, you're a chick, and worried about this stuff.

Boys may go laugh at the comical foreignness of Japanese Apple Switch Advertisements.