« (checking calendar) | Main | In other news, I'm almost out of that cappuccino lip balm I like so much »

I like Joan Cusack. . .

Then again, I sometimes read comic books, so my taste is suspect. In today's New York Times, Nick Hornby writes that Graphic Novels Speak Louder Than Words:

The more exposure to graphic novels one has, the more one realizes that the relative youth of the medium, at least in its current adult form, presents its artists with problems of appropriateness that the more established arts don't have. Whereas most established writers know what constitutes a novel, and filmmakers understand what will sustain a film, even the best comic-book artists sometimes seem unsure of their material and their intended audience.

Which might be a perception of the reader, not a problem on the part of the artist, but eh.

Lynda Barry's One Hundred Demons is mentioned favorably. Read the article for that.

Update: Actually, I'd been at NYT looking for The Shifting Lexicon of Race, a link to which Giles sent me, proving once again the value of leaving mail on the server if you're going to be dual-booting.

Apart from older words like "anti-Semitism" and "xenophobia," "racism" was the earliest and most potent of those terms. The word had actually been coined in the 1930's as a variant of "racialism," to describe the racial doctrines of the fascists. By 1960, however, people were using the term to describe a personal or collective disposition that ran too deep to be accessible to cursory introspection. That was the Catch-22 of "racism": if you denied it you could be suspected of not really understanding what it was about.

All of a sudden you could be held responsible for feelings you didn't know you had. "I'm not a racist" came to sound a bit like "I don't have any homosexual anxiety."

It's by Geoffrey Nunberg, "a senior researcher at the Center for the Study of Language and Information at Stanford University [and] a Consulting Professor in the Stanford Department of Linguistics."

Just because he's in linguisitcs, you shouldn't bring any anti-Chomsky feelings to the piece. The East Coast-West Coast rivalry among linguists is way worse than the one between rappers back in the day. . .

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.uppity-negro.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/496

Comments

My library just started stocking graphic novels. They put them in the kids' section. How long do you think that will last?

Until someone reads one.

mad props goin out to my west side socio-linguist. i'm trying to picture chomsky and lakoff in run-DMC gear blasting away to the "king of rock" riff, shouting: "A decision as to the boundary separating syntax and semantics (if there is one) is not a prerequisite for theoretical and descriptive study of syntactic and semantic rules. On the contrary, the problem of delimitation will clearly remain open until these fields are much better understood than they are today. Exactly the same can be said about the boundary separating semantic systems from systems of knowledge and belief. That these seem to interpenetrate in obscure ways has long been noted…." with their arms folded gangsta-style.

Heh... cracked up by 3 entries in a row. R@d@r's bit is causing me to have MC Steven HAwking's flashbacks. Ah..... the mighty quake master.

Wondering about what the quote above means, concerning the audience of drawn books.

The FIRST audience of any book is its author. My audience turns out to be anybody with more education -- including autodidacts.

Drawn book are for everyone, just like any other book form.

Donna, I'd mention that it's difficult to convince people of this in the States, but kind'a figure you already know that. . .

Dru, pretty much what Hanne said, except they probably won't actually read it. Especially if the one they pick up is one of the unflipped manga collections the kids are all into these days.

Apparently, some parents fear this will cause their children to learn to read the wrong way.

I wish I was making this up.

Refinement - the first audience of any GOOD book is the author. Way too many have been written with demographics in mind.

Doesn't the introduction of product placement in novels mean the first audience is the sponsor?

Has anyone done product placement in a graphic novel? I don't think those old Hostess ads count. . .

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)