« salaryman | Main | Media Vita »

October 02, 2002

Building an insanity defense

Exhibit A: Chicago Bears - Superbowl Shuffle mp3 (no longer available for reasons of space, bandwidth and good taste. . . crazy ain't gotta mean ugly. Which don't explain --)

Exhibit B: Reading Mister Charlie:

White House: assassination of Saddam would be cheaper than war

Hmm, lessee. Nine billion bucks for a month's worth of battle, or less than a buck for a single bullet in the skull.

By George, I think Ari's right. Now watch the lefty loons start to screech about how horrible is the very notion of blowing Saddam away.

And the creatures he chooses not to ban:

They're aiming for the wrong guy: from lucianne:

Following the stolen election of 2000, the United States economy was healthy and experiencing the greatest period of economic prosperity it has ever enjoyed. From 1992-2000, the federal government had a $1.5 trillion surplus. It only took nine months for the surplus to be given to the rich (corporations that profit from war) at the expense of the poor.-snip-The Center also notes that “last year’s tax cut is the largest single reason the ten-year surplus has shrunk since January 2001.”

An article from everyone's fav adulterous reverend.

http://www.blackpressusa.com/op-ed/speaker.asp?NewsID=2541

And here I thought you lot had already killed "everyone's fav adulterous reverend," in Memphis, back in '68.

My bad.

Ophelia: ~ Sings ~

They bore him barefaced on the bier;
Hey non nonny, nonny, hey nonny;
And in his grave rain'd many a tear:--
Fare you well, my dove!

. . . they're not going to fall for this, are they?

Ended up at Daily Pundit by way of In Arguendo, by way of Pen-Elayne on the Web, by way of a comment at Comicon.com PULSE's coverage of the Gaiman-McFarlane trial.

Ok, that ought to help. . .

Posted by Aaron at October 2, 2002 01:54 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.uppity-negro.com/cgi-uppity-negro/mt-tb.cgi/557

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Building an insanity defense:

Comments

Post a comment